Section 7.5.1
America's Second Harvest became Feeding America in 2008. This study was published prior to that name change in 2001.
7.5.1 - General Assistance, Welfare, and TANF in the Previous Two
Years
Clients were asked whether they received general
assistance, welfare, or TANF in the previous two years and, if so, whether the
assistance had been discontinued. They also provided reasons for the
discontinuation. Table 7.5.1 presents the results.
| Table 7.5.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source
This table was constructed based on usable
responses to Questions 26, 27, and 28 of the client survey.
Notes
The percentages presented in this table are based
only on usable responses, excluding missing, don't know, and refusal responses.
All usable responses were weighted as described in Chapter 3 and in the
Technical Appendix volume to represent all emergency food clients of the A2H
network. The sample sizes (N) also include missing data.
For receiving assistance, missing, don't know, and refusal responses combined are 2.3% for pantry clients, for kitchen clients, 1.4% for shelter clients, and 2.3% for all clients.
For reasons for discontinuation of assistance, missing, don't know, and refusal responses combined are 9.7% for pantry clients, 6.5% for kitchen clients, 5.3% for shelter clients, and 8.9% for all clients.
1. This table was constructed based on usable responses to Questions 26, 27, and 28 of the client survey.
During the previous two years, 20.5% of the clients received general
assistance, welfare, or TANF. Details include:
- Among those who had received the specified assistance, 41.6% of them indicated that the assistance was discontinued.
- As for the reasons for the discontinuation, 37.4% ascribed it to having an ineligible income level, 6.9% to change of household makeup, and 8.7% to time limit for the assistance.
- In addition, 12.6% of the clients indicated that the assistance was discontinued because they were sanctioned by welfare or another agency, and 0.1% mentioned their citizenship status as a factor.
- Also, 6.3% of the clients no longer received the assistance because it was
too much hassle for them, and 6.9% chose to stop receiving the assistance.


